Vista 64 PDF creation

The Amyuni PDF Converter is our Printer Driver that enables you to convert any documents to PDF format. If you have any questions about installing and using the Amyuni PDF Converter please post them here.
Post Reply
TDWiseley
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Jul 18 2007

Vista 64 PDF creation

Post by TDWiseley »

Trying to get an application that ran on Vista 32 to run on Vista 64 (AMD). Downloaded and installed the latest files (3.0.3.0 and 4.0.0.8), and reviewed current information from previous posts, including NUL: ports, etc.. Everything works fine until the Print command, and then the application hangs w/ no error messages or exceptions, and neither the PrintPage nor QueryPageSettings events are ever reached. Is there a document or test plan that contains all the switches, gotchas, etc. that need to be addressed?
banker
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Dec 16 2009

Re: Vista 64 PDF creation

Post by banker »

I've got the exact same problem as you, only on Windows 7 64-bit.
It only works if I run our application as administrator and close Outlook (we generate pdf and sends it using sendmail).

Have you solved this problem yet?
If so, I'm very happy if you have some pointers for me on how to fix this.
Regards,

Bjarne Anker
AKVA group Software
Norway
TDWiseley
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Jul 18 2007

Re: Vista 64 PDF creation

Post by TDWiseley »

We've found that by creating a dummy port for each instantied printer, it works like a charm.
banker
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Dec 16 2009

Re: Vista 64 PDF creation

Post by banker »

Ok.
I notice that the printer is set up to use the NUL: port.
But you've created another port instead?
Which settings do you use?
Regards,

Bjarne Anker
AKVA group Software
Norway
TDWiseley
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Jul 18 2007

Re: Vista 64 PDF creation

Post by TDWiseley »

1. Open printer properties for the created Amyuni Printer
2. Click on Ports tab
3. Click on Add Port...
4. In Printer Ports dialog, click on New Port...
5. Enter 'PDF1' (or any text), click OK
6. Repeat for each Amy printer, using a different 'port name'
Post Reply